ungovernable.tech

[ COMPARISON ][ OFF-GRID AND MESH NETWORKS ][ SECURE MESSAGING ]

Off-grid communication compared

Match the tool to the people and paths you can actually reach when connectivity fails.

updated 2026-10-25 3 min read
Contents

Summary

An off-grid plan needs reachable peers, compatible hardware and a tested route. The ranges below describe the transport's reach, not guaranteed distances. Capacity is described by workload class because radio settings, topology and interference prevent a single useful throughput number across these systems.

Meshtastic and MeshCore, side by side

Question Meshtastic MeshCore
Reach LoRa links; the project describes kilometre-scale communication, extended by relaying LoRa links extended by repeaters; survey the actual path
Capacity Text and position messages over shared radio airtime Short messages over shared radio airtime; learned paths for direct messages
Hardware Supported LoRa radio; optional paired phone Supported LoRa radio as companion, repeater or room server
Relaying Nodes can rebroadcast packets through the mesh Companions do not relay; dedicated repeaters do
Encryption Channel keys and public-key direct messages; the default channel key is public; no forward secrecy AES-128 block encryption in ECB mode with a short MAC; the default public channel key is published
Readiness Usable Usable, with the cryptographic limits described in its entry

The Meshtastic encryption documentation and MeshCore FAQ distinguish private communication from public channel defaults. Choose one supported ecosystem for a radio group and rehearse it using building a mesh.

Other transports and applications

Option Reach and capacity Hardware Encryption boundary Readiness
Reticulum Carrier-dependent local or wide-area links; supports low-bandwidth radios and higher-capacity backhaul Computer plus interfaces such as RNode LoRa, packet radio or Wi-Fi Encrypted communication and forward secrecy are documented; application behavior still matters Usable
Briar Nearby Bluetooth/Wi-Fi synchronization; Tor when internet exists; capacity follows transport Supported devices with Briar installed End-to-end encrypted communication; contacts and local device security matter Battle-tested; project is in maintenance mode
Bitchat Nearby BLE mesh, extended by relaying; short-message workload; Nostr path requires internet Compatible phones or computers Noise for live private chats; public broadcasts are not private; radio metadata remains visible Experimental
HF data modes, illustrated by JS8Call Long-distance radio under suitable propagation; low-bandwidth text and store-and-forward HF radio, antenna and computer/audio connection Do not treat amateur-radio traffic as a confidential channel; applicable rules matter Battle-tested category; check the chosen mode and equipment
Satellite IoT, illustrated by Iridium SBD Global satellite service footprint; short packet messages Compatible satellite modem and service plan The cited SBD overview does not establish application end-to-end encryption Usable, with operator and subscription dependencies

Trust model / threat model

Local radios avoid depending on a working internet path, but encrypted content does not make a transmitter unobservable. Bitchat's whitepaper specifically documents visible identity and routing metadata. Satellite connectivity depends on the operator's infrastructure even when local cellular service is absent.

For HF, licensing and content rules depend on the service and jurisdiction. As a concrete example, US amateur-radio rules prohibit messages encoded to obscure their meaning, subject to specified exceptions. Do not transfer the private-channel assumptions of a different radio service to amateur HF.

Readiness and limits

The labels match the individual entries. They describe implementation maturity, not coverage at your location. Before relying on a plan, test message delivery with internet disabled, normal device power settings, the intended antennas and the actual people who must receive it. Keep an alternative path and a meeting plan; start with shutdown preparedness.

Primary sources

Also in Secure Messaging

Page history

Updated
2026-10-25
Origin
Written for ungovernable.tech.
Improve this page
Suggest an edit — issues and pull requests are welcome.